December 06, 2020 • 2 min read

- python

I’ve been learning a bit of Python this Fall to facilitate conversations with a mentee. In this post, I’m going to share the first Python function I’ve ever written, a solution to the Exercism challenge ‘Raindrops’.

Is this good Python code? I don’t know; that’s why I’m posting it here. I’ve
read `$ python3 -c 'import this'`

yet am still gloriously ignorant. Below I’ll
share the problem, my solution, and a code self-review via praise and
criticism.

Your task is to convert a number into a string that contains raindrop sounds corresponding to certain potential factors. A factor is a number that evenly divides into another number, leaving no remainder. The simplest way to test if a one number is a factor of another is to use the modulo operation.

The rules of `raindrops`

are that if a given number:

- has 3 as a factor, add ‘Pling’ to the result.
- has 5 as a factor, add ‘Plang’ to the result.
- has 7 as a factor, add ‘Plong’ to the result.
*does not*have any of 3, 5, or 7 as a factor, the result should be the digits of the number.

```
def convert(number):
result = str(number) + " "
if number % 3 == 0:
result += "Pling"
if number % 5 == 0:
result += "Plang"
if number % 7 == 0:
result += "Plong"
return result.split()[-1]
```

Starting with a very low bar, I like that this solution is compilable Python code. I think the solution is very readable. My return statement is a bit clever; it takes the last item in the string which is either some variant of the Raindrops string, or the number itself as a string. I’ve done this exercise in a few languages and it’s a take I’ve never thought of before, and so I enjoy the novelty there.

I don’t like that my function argument is called `number`

; I took that from the
setup code but I prefer to avoid argument names that carry their type. In this
case, the input really is a meaningless number, so I’m not sure what a better
alternative would be.

I try to avoid conditionals and there are three here. I’d prefer a data structure that we can fetch from whenever possible. For the sake of speed and simplicity, I didn’t go that route, but I am sure that I will as I get more comfortable with Python.

As mentioned in the previous section, `return result.split()[-1]`

is clever, in
both the good and bad meanings of that word. I can imagine someone who is newer
to string manipulation struggling with that a bit. It isn’t the most
beginner-friendly code I’ve ever written.

I hope this beginner Python code was entertaining to someone. It lives online at this permalink.

Blog of Jake Worth.